Why Voting Third Party Is Not A Wasted Vote

It presumes that third parties are not viable in the first place and then goes on to conclude that the third party will not win and due to this voters should not consider it. It is never unprincipled to vote one.

Why Voting Third Party Is Not A Wasted Vote - If you're searching for picture and video information linked to the keyword you have come to pay a visit to the right blog. Our site gives you hints for seeing the maximum quality video and picture content, search and find more informative video articles and graphics that match your interests. includes one of tens of thousands of video collections from various sources, particularly Youtube, therefore we recommend this video for you to view. It is also possible to bring about supporting this site by sharing videos and graphics that you enjoy on this site on your social networking accounts like Facebook and Instagram or educate your closest friends share your experiences concerning the ease of access to downloads and the information that you get on this website. This blog is for them to stop by this website.

Your Vote Doesn T Count Reason Com

America has not elected a third party candidate since 1860.

Why voting third party is not a wasted vote. Voting for a third-party candidate therefore will not throw your vote away. The Republican and Democratic parties and to your fellow citizens. Third party voters will still be under the leadership of whomever wins from the main parties which is an issue to think about in the voting process.

The reasons for this are complicated but the argument that Libertarians constantly hear is that people dont want to waste their votes on the third-largest party or any of the other alternatives. When you vote third party in 2016 your vote matters. The same logic could be applied to Hillary Clinton.

Join any third party and merely suggest that another person consider voting for a third party candidate and you will hear ad nauseum I dont want to waste my vote. And voting for someone other than Donald Trump is not supporting Hillary Clinton. Third party voting outcome usually is to capture attention for future change instead of winning.

The biggest objection by allies to voting for a Third Party is the wasted vote argument the idea that if you vote for someone who will not win then the vote does not count. If you dont vote for Hillary Clinton are you voting for Donald Trump. This presumption is faulty because if a candidate were not viable such as Mickey Mouse although Mickey actually receives thousands of votes each election they would not be listed on the ballot as an option.

Blow a false equivalency. And those who decide to vote for a third party are sending a very powerful message. The current political environment has convinced voters that giving out a vote to a third party candidate will cost votes for a mainstream candidate that they would reluctantly prefer.

The beauty of voting third party is that when more people do it the party will win more and more of the popular vote. Bush has proven to be less conservative than some on the right had hoped he at least will put judges into office who will be better than those a Democrat would select. Many Republicans have argued that even if George W.

Given that neither candidate is likely to be elected the main reasons to cast a vote for Jorgensen Hawkins or another minor-party candidate are to register a protest -- Im not. As with so many things throughout history she said just because something has been the status quo doesnt mean it should continue to be the status quo. Therefore its not a wasted vote at all.

When asked why they will not vote for a third party candidate many people will respond by saying something like He cannot win Or I dont want to waste my vote It is true. When candidates can get nominated by receiving only 9 of the vote then each vote has more power than almost ever before. Voting Your Conscience for a Third Party Candidate Is Not a Wasted Vote.

Yes it is informative but still a wasted vote. The idea of this argument is that your vote doesnt count if you vote for someone who probably will not win. The simple fact is a vote for a third-party is not a wasted vote.

Daugherty said the defeatist attitude of voting third party is a big reason for the lack of voter turnout. And for the voters that means more choices. The odds against them are therefore indeed daunting but to say that supporting them is unprincipled is truly to quote Mr.

In fact while third parties have gained traction at times in history no third-party. The change occurs not because the third party candidate was elected but because he pulled a mainstream partys candidate in his direction. Does that automatically mean however that every vote cast for one of the two major party candidates is not a wasted.

Evil choice is to vote for a third-party candidate even though one knows that the candidate wont be elected. In the future third-party candidates could be allowed to debate alongside partisan politicians and get just as much recognition as the democrats and republicans. The Nader effect is the most recent example of the wasted vote theory.

Why Third-Party Voting Is a Bad Idea Your Third-Party Vote Could Affect the Outcome of the Election but Not in the Way Youd Hope October 23 2020 by Kaley Rohlinger. For the first time in decades your vote actually matters because it does not have to be drowned out by either of the two parties. In our winner-take all presidential election system two parties dominate.